RIAA LAWSUITS WON’T WORK (7-2003) The recording industry is at it again. Despite the fact that the industry has filed, and in most cases won, several lawsuits against Internet song-swapping services, the free online music remains as easy to get as ever. So what does the Recording Industry Association of America do next? That’s right, it threatens even more lawsuits – hundreds of them. This time, in addition to going after the song-swapping services, they are going after the individual computer users who may have song files on their hard drives that are accessible to others for downloading. The RIAA is expecting to file several hundred lawsuits over the next couple of months against individual users who share their music online. Although it says it will start with the biggest offenders, it is likely to continue the lawsuits, perhaps even down to the occasional downloader. As Fred von Lohmann, a lawyer for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, noted: the recording industry has now declared war on the American consumer, and its own customer base. “This latest effort really indicates the recording industry has lost touch with reality completely,” Lohmann told the Associated Press. So what is the reality? It’s true that allowing other computer users to download copyrighted music from your computer is a violation of copyright law, even if no money is made from the transaction. It’s also true that, partly because of music sharing online, the recording industry has suffered a decline in revenue in the past couple of years. At least that’s what they claim. But it’s also true that the reason for this is that the recording industry has failed to keep pace with the consumer’s changing preferences about how they want their music delivered, and how they prefer to listen to it. Music consumers are tired of having to pay outrageous prices to the record labels for a CD. Even at discount prices, a CD will cost anywhere between $13.00 and $17.00. That CD costs the recording industry pennies to produce, and the royalties paid to the song writers are minuscule. And the artists, unless they are superstars, don’t make as much as one might think. Most of their income is derived from live concerts, not record sales. In the last year or so, the recording industry has attempted a half-hearted effort to give music consumers what they want: the ability to download individual songs from their favorite artists from online sites. But most of these sites have so many restrictions attached that it’s not worth the price of admission. For example, some of the sites offer streaming music only. Other sites allow you to download files to your computer, but you can’t transfer them to your own CD or to a portable player. The RIAA claims that song swapping online is stealing. That’s certainly debatable. When you steal something from someone, the person you steal it from no longer possesses it. Sharing a song online does not take anything from the recording industry, because they still own the rights to the song and can still sell CDs containing it at their usual exorbitant prices. What it does do is force the recording industry to yield to the demands of their own consumers. Music lovers no longer want to pay 15 bucks for a piece of plastic that contains a dozen songs selected by the studio, when all they really wanted was their favorite three or four. Consumers want the ability to download whatever songs they wish, to make personal copies, and to be able to transfer the songs to disc or other portable devices so they can take their music with them. Free song-swapping services offer exactly what the consumer wants. When the recording industry offers the same thing, at very reasonable prices, most consumers will be happy to pay that price. Only then will consumers start to lose interest in the pirate sites. The RIAA must develop a new paradigm for selling its music. It must offer exactly what the free services are offering, but because it must charge a fee, it must also offer a bit more. It will happen eventually. When the recording industry finally realizes that filing hundreds of lawsuits will do nothing but cost millions of dollars, somebody in the industry will say, “Enough. Let’s give the consumers what they really want.”